Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Quick Guide to Memory T Cells

 

Introduction to memory T cells

 

Antigen-specific memory T cells have provided highly efficient and long-lasting immunity against infections.1 The important role of T cell-mediated immunity in prophylactic vaccines has become more evident over the years, in diseases such as hepatitis C, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV).2

 

These antigen-specific T cell responses originate from a small number of naïve precursor cells, which, following several phases, are able to stably persist as memory T cells even in the absence of antigens.1 These patterns of diversification observed during infection or in response to vaccination are important for the quality of antigen-specific immunity.1

 

The stages of T cell diversification

 

  1. Antigen-specific interactions between T cells and dendritic cells can last for up to 12 hours, while CD4+ and CD8+ T cells receive necessary signals for activation.2
  2. This activation results in alteration of expression of various molecules, including integrins, selectins, and chemokine receptors, which, in turn promote T cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration of T cells to inflamed tissue.2
  3. Following resolution of the infection, 90-95% of the effector T cells are eliminated by programmed cell death, and a small but diverse pool of memory cells survive.2
  4. This led to the identification of two distinct subsets: effector memory T cells and central memory T cells, and more recently, tissue resident-memory T cells.2

 

Upon re-exposure to antigens in a secondary immune response, memory T cells undergo rapid population expansion and mediate more robust effector functions compared with the primary immune response, which leads to rapid clearance of the infection.3 Essential features of memory T cells are (1) evidence of prior expansion and/or activation, (2) persistence in the absence of antigens, (3) enhanced functional activity upon antigen re-exposure.3

 

The subsets: central, effector and tissue resident memory T cells

 

T cell subsets can then be further characterised based on their effector memory differentiation status. Every effector/memory subset has unique characteristics which provide them with differential migratory capacity, longevity, and functionality.

 

 

 Effector memory T cellsCentral memory T cellsTissue resident T cells (TRM)
How can they be identified?Combined expression and/or lack of cell surface markers (e.g., KLRG1hi/CD44hi/ CD127lo/CD62Llo)2Expression of KLRG1lo/ CD44hi/CD127hi/CD62hi surface markers2Expression of CD69hi/CD62Llo/CD44hi and other surface markers (e.g., CD11a, CD38, CD49a)2
Where do they reside?Non-lymphoid tissue and in peripheral circulation2Secondary lymphoid organs and in peripheral circulation2Most organs and peripheral tissue2
Proliferation capacity?Limited2Superior2Limited1
Circulation capacity?Yes2Yes2No2

 

 

Multiparametric T cell assays

 

Multiparametric assays, such as flow cytometry using fluorochrome-conjugated cell surface antigen-specific antibodies, can identify T cell activation markers and provide key insights into a range of research areas, including the development of new diagnostic and prognostic tests.1,4

 

For instance, the ability to observe the magnitude of a vaccine-elicited T cell response may serve as a predictor for efficacy in vaccination settings.2  Research has shown that the size of a CMV viral inoculation directly influences the degree of memory T cell inflation and degree of immune alterations in long-lasting infections; data show a clear correlation between the magnitude of the CD8+ T cell response and the frequency of these cells exhibiting an effector memory phenotype.5,6

 

Significant decreases have been observed in the counts of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood of patients with COVID-19, more so in severe COVID-19 cases compared to mild-to-moderate illness.4 CD4+ and CD8+ were selected as candidate diagnostic markers in the diagnosis of COVID-19 and prediction of severe cases.4

 

In the treatment of some cancers, CD44 expression may act as a biomarker for worse prognosis. CD44 expression in the mucosa of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) was significantly higher than in normal mucosa, and was higher in dysplastic than non-dysplastic leukoplakia. 7 This indicates a correlation between the expression this cell adhesion molecule as a cancer stem cell antigen and transition to OSCC.7

 

Useful resources for carrying out your flow cytometry experiment

 

 

 

 

 

References

  1. Busch DH, Fräßle SP, Sommermeyer D, Buchholz VR, Riddell SR. Role of memory T cell subsets for adoptive immunotherapy. Semin Immunol. 2016;28(1):28-34. doi:10.1016/j.smim.2016.02.001
  2. Panagioti E, Klenerman P, Lee LN, van der Burg SH, Arens R. Features of Effective T Cell-Inducing Vaccines against Chronic Viral Infections. Front Immunol. 2018;9:276. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.00276
  3. Rosenblum MD, Way SS, Abbas AK. Regulatory T cell memory. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(2):90-101. doi:10.1038/nri.2015.1
  4. Jiang M, Guo Y, Luo Q, et al. T-Cell Subset Counts in Peripheral Blood Can Be Used as Discriminatory Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Severity Prediction of Coronavirus Disease 2019. J Infect Dis. 2020;222(2):198-202. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiaa252
  5. Redeker A, Welten SPM, Arens R. Viral inoculum dose impacts memory T-cell inflation. Eur J Immunol. 2014;44(4):1046-1057. doi:10.1002/eji.201343946
  6. Redeker A, Remmerswaal EBM, van der Gracht ETI, et al. The Contribution of Cytomegalovirus Infection to Immune Senescence Is Set by the Infectious Dose. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1953. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01953
  7. Ghazi N, Saghravanian N, Taghi Shakeri M, Jamali M. Evaluation of CD44 and TGF-B Expression in Oral Carcinogenesis. Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran). 2021;22(1):33-40. doi:10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.84393.1079

    

    

BD and the BD Logo are trademarks of Becton, Dickinson and Company or its affiliates. © 2022 BD. All rights reserved.