|
|
Protocols
Cytokine ELISA Protocol
|
|
I.
|
Introduction
|
|
|
Due to the amplifying potential of enzyme labels, immunoassays
that use enzyme-conjugated antibodies have become increasingly popular
because of their high specificity and sensitivity.1
In 1971, Engvall and Perlmann2
coined the term "enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay" which is perhaps
better known by the acronym, "ELISA", to describe an enzyme-based
immunoassay method which is useful for measuring antigen concentrations.
Cytokine sandwich ELISA are sensitive enzyme
immunoassays that can specifically detect and quantitate the
concentration of soluble cytokine and chemokine proteins. The basic
cytokine sandwich ELISA method makes use of highly-purified
anti-cytokine antibodies (capture antibodies) which are noncovalently
adsorbed ("coated" – primarily as a result of hydrophobic interactions)
onto plastic microwell plates. After plate washings, the immobilized
antibodies serve to specifically capture soluble cytokine proteins
present in samples which were applied to the plate. After washing away
unbound material, the captured cytokine proteins are detected by
biotin-conjugated anti-cytokine antibodies (detection antibodies)
followed by an enzyme-labeled avidin or streptavidin stage. Following the addition of a chromogenic
substrate, the level of colored product generated by the bound,
enzyme-linked detection reagents can be conveniently measured
spectrophotometrically using an ELISA-plate reader at an appropriate
optical density (OD). Data storage and reanalysis are greatly
simplified when the plate reader is connected to a computer.
A standard curve is incorporated into a sandwich ELISA assay by
making serial dilutions of a standard cytokine protein solution
of known concentration. Standard curves (aka "calibration curves")
are generally plotted as the standard cytokine protein concentration
(typically ng or pg of cytokine/ml) versus the corresponding mean
OD value of replicates. The concentrations of the putative cytokine-containing
samples can be interpolated from the standard curve. This process
is made easier by using an ELISA computer software program.3
Generally, it is useful to perform a dilution series of the unknown
samples to be assured that the OD will fall within the linear portion
of the standard curve. Depending on the nature of the ELISA reagents
used, investigators may choose to apply different curve fit analysis
to their data, including either linear-log, log-log, or four-parameter
transformations.1,4,5
Although opinions differ, one convention for determining the ELISA
sensitivity is to choose the lowest cytokine concentration that
gives a signal which is at least two or three standard deviations
above the mean background signal value.6,7
Because of the enzyme-mediated amplification of the detection antibody
signal, the sandwich ELISA can measure physiologically relevant
(i.e., > 5-10 pg/ml) concentrations of specific cytokine
and chemokine proteins, which are present in mixed cytokine milieus,
e.g., from stimulated lymphocyte culture supernatants. Although
many different types of enzymes have been used, horseradish peroxidase
(HRP) and alkaline phosphatase (AKP) are the enzymes that are often
employed in ELISA methods.1,8
|
|
II.
|
Application Notes
|
|
|
Cytokine sandwich ELISA are exquisitely specific because antibodies
directed against two or more distinct epitopes are required.9
Therefore, sandwich ELISA can discriminate between cytokines that
can have overlapping biological functions which are not resolvable
in a bioassay. Although cytokine sandwich ELISA are very useful
for cytokine detection and measurement, several limitations for
the interpretation of ELISA data must be mentioned.9
For example, because test samples often come from tissue culture
supernatants or biological fluids which are conditioned with cytokines
produced by mixed cell populations, the ELISA data does not provide
direct information on the identities and frequencies of individual
cytokine producing cells. Techniques such as the "Immunofluorescent
Staining of Intracellular Cytokines" are required for this
latter type of analysis.
Several key issues need to be considered when designing experiments
that involve cytokine and chemokine protein measurements using sandwich
ELISA. For instance, it is well known that cytokine production by
stimulated cell populations is transient and that the kinetics of
expression of different cytokine genes can vary. For these reasons,
it may therefore be necessary to collect test samples at several
time points to better characterize cytokine-production by an experimental
animal or by a cultured cell population. As an example, in the case
of stimulated mouse CD4+T cell populations, the levels
of IL-2 produced are detected relatively early after stimulation
whereas the accumulated levels of IL-5 protein rise later in culture.10
It should also be noted that cytokine production can be stimulus-
and cell subset-dependent. For example, in the case of T cells,
it is well known that naive T cells have a limited cytokine production
capability (i.e., primarily can produce IL-2) whereas memory
T cells can produce high levels and different types of cytokine
proteins including IFN-gamma and IL-4, as well as IL-2. 11,12
Moreover, T cell subsets have been found to produce cytokines
differentially in response to different stimuli.12,13
Another consideration is that cytokine protein concentrations, measured
at any one time point, may reflect the concurrent processes of cytokine
secretion, cytokine uptake by cells and cytokine protein degradation.
Because of these processes, the measured level of cytokine protein
may significantly underestimate the actual cytokine-producing potential
of cells. In these cases, it may be necessary to use complementary
techniques such as multi-probe ribonuclease protection assay analysis,
immunofluorescent intracellular cytokine staining with flow cytometric
analysis, or ELISPOT, to gauge the relative levels of cytokine expression
by various test cell populations.
The levels of immunoreactive cytokine proteins detected by ELISA may or may
not correlate directly with the levels of bioactive cytokine protein.9,14
For example, an ELISA may utilize anti-cytokine antibodies that
cannot discriminate between the precursor (inactive) and mature
(bioactive) forms of a cytokine protein such as TGFb1. Moreover,
an ELISA may detect partially-degraded cytokine proteins which have
retained their immunoreactive properties (i.e., at least
two recognizable epitopes) but may have lost their bioactivity.
In conclusion, cytokine sandwich ELISA are useful indicators of
the presence and levels of cytokine and chemokine proteins but they
do not actually provide information concerning the biological potency
of the detected proteins.
With these caveats in mind, one can infer from the presence and
amount of cytokine protein detected the potential mechanisms by
which particular effector cell populations perform their functions.
Moreover, sandwich ELISAs can detect soluble cytokine receptors
which may be important for cytokine regulation. Soluble cytokine
receptors may act as antagonists or as carrier proteins in vivo
and may serve as disease markers in in vitro tests.15
It should be noted that in addition to providing a rich source of
information for clinical and basic science research studies, sandwich
ELISA for measuring cytokines and their receptors have become increasingly
important as diagnostic tools and for monitoring therapeutic regimens,16
e.g., biological response modification regimens utilizing
recombinant cytokine proteins. In the latter cases, highly optimized
sandwich ELISA kits designed to minimize interference or nonspecific
reactivities presented by patient samples is highly desirable.
|
|
III.
|
ELISA Protocol General Procedure
|
|
|
|
Capture antibody:
- Dilute the purified anti-cytokine capture antibody to
1-4 µg/mla in Binding Solution. Add 100
µl of diluted antibody to the
wells of an enhanced protein-binding ELISA plate (e.g.,
Falcon cat. no. 353279 or Nunc Maxisorb cat. no. 446469).
- Seal plate to prevent evaporation. Incubate overnight
at 4°C.
|
|
Blocking:
- Bring the plate to room temperature (RT), remove the capture
antibody solution, and block non-specific binding by adding
200 µl of Blocking Buffer per
well.
- Seal plate and incubate at RT for 1-2 hr.
- Wash ≥ 3 timesd with PBS/Tween ® .
|
|
Standards and Samples:
- Add standardsc and samples (diluted in Blocking
Buffer/Tween ®h) at 100 µl
per well.
- Seal the plate and incubate it for 2-4 hrs at RT or overnight at 4°C.e
- Wash ≥ 4 times with PBS/Tween ®.
|
|
Detection antibody:
- Dilute the biotinylated anti-cytokine detection antibody
to 0.5-2 µg/ml in Blocking Buffer/Tween
®.h Add 100 µl
of diluted antibody to each well.
- Seal the plate and incubate it for 1 hr at RT.
- Wash ≥ 4 times d with PBS/Tween ®.
|
|
Avidin-Horseradish Peroxidase (Av-HRP):
- Dilute the Av-HRP conjugate (cat. no. 554058) or streptavidin-HRP
(cat. no. 554066) or other enzyme conjugate c,f
to its pre-titered optimal concentration in Blocking Buffer/Tween
®. Add 100 µl
per well.
- Seal the plate and incubate it at RT for 30 min.
- Wash ≥ 5 timesd with PBS/Tween ®.
|
|
Substrate:
- Use TMB (cat. no. 555214) according to directions or ABTS
as a substrate. Thaw ABTS Substrate Solution c,f
within 20 min of use. Add 100 µl
of 3% H2O2 per 11 ml of substrate
and vortex. Immediately dispense 100 µl
into each well. Incubate at RT (5-80 min) for color development.
- Read the optical density (OD) for each well with a microplate reader set to 405 nm.g
|
SOLUTIONS:
Binding Solution: 0.1 M Na HPO4, adjust
to pH 9.0 or to pH 6.0 with 0.1 M NaH2PO4
(note: use pH 6.0 Binding Solution for mouse IL-10, mouse MCP-1,
mouse TNF, rat GM-CSF ELISAs).
PBS Solution: 80.0 g NaCl, 11.6 g Na2HPO4
, 2.0 g KH2PO4 , 2.0 g KCl; q.s. to 10 L;
pH to 7.0
PBS/Tween®: 0.5 ml of Tween ®-20 in 1
L PBS.
Blocking Buffer: Prepare 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 10%
newborn calf serum (NBCS) or 1% BSA (immunoassay grade) in PBS.
The Blocking Buffer should be filtered to remove particulates before
use.
Blocking Buffer/Tween®: Add 0.5 ml
Tween ®-20 to 1 L Blocking Buffer.
TMB Substrate Solution (cat. no. 555214): Prepare a working
concentration of TMB substrate solution within 15 minutes prior
to use by mixing equal volumes of Substrate Reagent A and Substrate
Reagent B (e.g. for one 96-well plate, a 12 mL TMB substrate working
solution can be prepared by mixing 6 mL of Substrate A with 6 mL
of Substrate Reagent B).
ABTS Substrate Solution: Add 150 mg 2,2'-Azino-bis- (3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic
acid) (e.g., Sigma, Cat. No. A-1888) to 500 ml of 0.1 M anhydrous
citric acid (e.g., Fisher; Cat. No. A-940) in dd H20;
pH to 4.35 with NaOH. Aliquot 11 ml per vial and store at -20°C.
Add 100 µl 3% H2O2
prior to use.
3% H2O2 Solution: Add
10 ml of 30% H2O2 to 90 ml of ddH2O.
Protect from prolonged exposure to light.
|
|
IV.
|
Cytokine ELISA Helpful Hints
|
|
|
- To determine the optimal signal and lowest background for the
ELISA, the capture antibody (1-4 µg/ml)
and detection antibody (0.25-2 µg/ml)
should be titrated against each other in a preliminary experiment.
An appropriate range of serial dilutions for the cytokine standard
should be included. A suggested range is generally provided on
the Technical Data Sheet (TDS) for ELISA reagents. Generally,
use of the capture antibody at 2 µg/ml
and the detecting antibody at 1 µg/ml
provides strong ELISA signals with low back-ground.
- CYTOKINE STANDARD HANDLING: Please read the TDS for each recombinant
cytokine carefully. Handling instructions are lot-specific. For
maximum recovery of cytokine, the vial of cytokine should be quick-spun
before opening. Lyophilized cytokines should be reconstituted
as indicated in the lot-specific TDS. It is recommended to keep
the cytokine solution in a concentrated form (e.g., ≥
1 µg/ml) and in the presence of a protein
carrier for long-term storage.
- The linear region of cytokine ELISA
standard curves are generally obtainable in a series of eight
two-fold dilutions of the cytokine standard, from 2000 pg/ml to 15
pg/ml. To increase sensitivity beyond that obtainable with the
standard ELISA protocol, amplification kits, tertiary reagents, or
alternate enzyme/substrate systems can be used.
- High backgrounds in blank wells (i.e., OD > 0.20) or poor consistency
of replicates can be overcome by increasing the stringency of
washes and optimizing the concentration of capture and detection
antibodies. For example, during washes, the wells can be soaked
for ~ 1 minute intervals. Moreover, lower concentrations of detecting
antibody or more washes after the detecting antibody stage can
reduce background.
- For optimal sensitivity, overnight incubation of standards and samples is recommended.
- If using peroxidase as the enzyme for
color development, avoid sodium azide in wash buffers and diluents,
as this is an inhibitor of peroxidase activity.
- If no signal is observed, check the following: a) verify that
appropriate antibody clones were used; b) check the activity of
the enzyme/substrate system: e.g.,coat 1 µg/ml
of biotinylated detecting antibody in several wells in binding
buffer for a few hr. After blocking, wash several times then proceed
with the cytokine ELISA protocol from Step 13. If the enzyme/substrate
system is active, then a strong signal should be seen; c) verify
the activity of cytokine standard or try a new sample of standard.
- When measuring cytokines in complex fluids, such as serum, sample
diluents which include irrelevant Ig are suggested.17
|
References:
|
1.
|
|
Crowther, J. R. 1995. ELISA. Theory and Practice. Methods
Mol. Biol. 42:1-223.
|
|
2.
|
|
Engvall, E., and P. Perlmann. 1971. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA). Quantitative assay of immunoglobulin G. I
mmunochem.8:871-874.
|
|
3.
|
|
Davies, C. 1994. Principles. In The Immunoassay Handbook.
D. Wild, ed. Stockton Press, New York, p. 3-47.
|
|
4.
|
|
Rogers, R. P. C. 1984. Data Analysis and Quality Control
of Assays: A Practical Primer. In Practical Immuno Assay. W. R. Butt,
ed. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
|
|
5.
|
|
Davies, C. 1994. Calibration curve fitting. In The
Immunoassay Handbook. D. Wild, ed, New York, p. 118-123.
|
|
6.
|
|
Davies, C. 1994. Concepts. In The Immunoassay Handbook. D.
Wild, ed. Stockton Press, New York, p. 83-115.
|
|
7.
|
|
Pathak, S. S., A. van Oudenaren, and H. F. J. Savelkoul.
1997. Quantification of immunoglobulin concentration by ELISA. In
Immunology Methods Manual, vol. 2. I. Lefkovitz, ed. Academic Press,
Inc., San Diego, p. 1056-1075.
|
|
8.
|
|
Wild, D., and C. Davies. 1994. Components. In The
Immunoassay Handbook. D. Wild, ed. Stockton Press, New York, p. 49-82.
|
|
9.
|
|
Mosmann, T. R., and T. A. T. Fong. 1989. Specific assays
for cytokine production by T cells. J. Immunol. Meth.116:151-158.
|
|
10.
|
|
Hobbs, M. V., W. O. Weigle, D. J. Noonan, B. E. Torbett,
R. J. McEvilly, R. J. Koch, G. J. Cardenas, and D. N. Ernst. 1993.
Patterns of cytokine gene expression by CD4 + T cells from young and
old mice. J. Immunol. 150:3602-3614.
|
|
11.
|
|
Ehlers, S., and K. A. Smith. 1991. Differentiation of T
cell lymphokine gene expression: The in vitro acquisition of T cell
memory. J. Exp. Med.173:25-36.
|
|
12.
|
|
Cerottini, J.C., and H. R. MacDonald. 1989. The cellular basis
of T-cell memory. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 7:77-89.
|
|
13.
|
|
Farber, D. L., M. Luqman, O. Acuto, and K. Bottomly. 1995.
Control of memory CD4 T cell activation: MHC class II molecules on APCs
and CD4 ligation inhibit memory but not naive CD4 T cells. Immunity
2:249-259.
|
|
14.
|
|
Carter, L. L., and S. L. Swain. 1997. Single cell analyses
of cytokine production. Curr. Opin. Immunol.9:177-182.
|
|
15.
|
|
Callard, R. E., and A. J. H. Gearing. 1994. Cytokine
receptor superfamilies. In The Cytokine Facts Book. Academic Press
Inc., San Diego, p. 18-27.
|
|
16.
|
|
Rossio, J. L. 1997. Cytokines and immune cell products. In
Weir's Handbook of Experimental Immunology. Fifth Edition. D. M. Weir,
L. A. Herzenberg, L. A. Herzenberg, and C. Blackwell, eds. Blackwell
Science, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
|
|
17.
|
|
Abrams, J.S. 1995. Immunoenzymetric assay of mouse and
human cytokines using NIP-labeled anti-cytokine antibodies. Current
Protocols in Immunology (J. Coligan, A. Kruisbeek, D. Margulies, E.
Shevach, W. Strober, eds). John Wiley and Sons, New York. Unit 6.20.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|